>La Grande Observer | Union and Wallowa Counties' News Leader

Observer news NE Oregon Classifieds Web
web powered by Web Search Powered by Google

Follow LaGrandeObserver.com

La Grande Observer print edition

view all La Grande Observer print publications »

The Observer Paper 12/17/14

The LaGrande Observer is now online in a Replica E-edition form and publishes Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. Current subscribers have full access to the E-edition.

View Paper

If you are not a current subscriber, subscribe today for immediate access.


Recent article comments

Powered by Disqus

Home arrow News arrow Local News arrow Judge tosses shelter lawsuit


Judge tosses shelter lawsuit

An order for Shelter From the Storm to evict its community advocacy center has been upheld in court.

Visiting Judge Eva Temple granted a motion from the county’s counsel to dismiss the lawsuit brought against the county by Shelter From the Storm in a ruling filed in court late Tuesday.

Temple, who serves as a judge in Hermiston, heard a day’s worth of testimony last week on the matter. Shelter From the Storm sought an injunction in order to stay at its advocacy center located on the county campus. The county notified the nonprofit in April that it must be out of the center, which was built with a Community Development Block Grant in 1998, by Sept. 1. The eviction notice followed a unanimous March decision by Union County commissioners to site a new county courthouse on the SFS center’s footprint.

In her opinion, Temple wrote the shelter failed to state a claim because it did not plead an acquisition of property within the meaning of the state or federal statutes under which it was seeking relief. Union County owns both the property the advocacy center sits on and the building itself. The county was the recipient of the $500,000 grant that built the center.

Temple also found that SFS “is a tenant at sufferance and its right to occupy the property lawfully under the lease ended on August 28, 2013.” Because of the expired lease, the shelter is not a displaced person as defined under federal law and cannot seek relief as such, the opinion says.

“Because the Relocation Act does not apply to the Plaintiff, the Defendant had no duties under the act, and the Plaintiff cannot prevail in its claim for damages resulting from a failure to abide by the act,” Temple wrote.


For the complete story, please see Wednesday's edition of The Observer. 


blog comments powered by Disqus
Local / Sports / Business / State / National / Obituaries / Public Notices
Editorials / Letters / Guest Columns / Columnists
Outdoors / Ag / Spiritual / Go Magazine / Portraits
View all classifieds / Jobs / Autos / Real Estate / Rentals / Place an Ad
The Observer
About / Contact / Commercial Printing / Subscriptions / Terms of Use / Site Map
Also Online
Photo Reprints / Slideshows / Weather and Valley Cam / /index.php?option=com_rss&feed=RSS2.0&no_html=1">RSS Feed ?> RSS Feed

Follow La Grande Observer headlines on Follow La Grande Observer headlines on Twitter

© Copyright 2001 - 2014 Western Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. By Using this site you agree to our Terms of Use

sildenafil generique kamagra andorra cialis 5 mg precio farmacia
teva viagra 
cialis pharmacie en ligne 
cialis générique 
levitra priser http://php.trinity.edu/mathtut/sites/def... cialis per nachnahme acheter viagra etats-unis acheter du cialis en france http://www.sust.edu/department/che/heqep... tadalafil generico prezzo originale farmacia viagra kamagra oral jelly viagra substitute uk cialis recept comprar cialis en usa es fiable viagra cialis acheter
  • kaufen viagra levitra prezzo vendo viagras