>La Grande Observer | Union and Wallowa Counties' News Leader

Observer news Yellow Pages NE Oregon Classifieds Web
web powered by Web Search Powered by Google

Follow LaGrandeObserver.com

Today's front page

Image of The Observer's Front Page

Get Home Delivery of The Observer for only $8.50 per month, $9.50 for motor routes. Just click here and after filling out one simple and secure online form you could be on your way to learning more information about local, state and world news.

manage your account »

Recent article comments

Powered by Disqus

Home arrow Opinion arrow Editorials arrow Day late and half-million short

Day late and half-million short

The Mount Emily Recreation Area Non-Motorized Advisory Committee and the county commission are in the process of deciding whether to consider a request from a group of citizens who would like to ensure there’s a community forest in one unit of the MERA. The proposal would require raising enough money to purchase the timber on the unit from Forest Capital Partners, which is in the process of logging portions of the recreation area as part of the agreement that put the entire 3,700-acre area into the county’s hands a year ago.
The community forest proposal isn’t a bad concept. However, the practicality of pulling off such a feat, especially at this point in the process, is a stretch. The citizens interested in establishing a community forest would need to raise an estimated $500,000 to $600,000 by the end of January, which alone would be pushing the time constraints set by Forest Capital when the purchase agreement was signed last year. That’s a chunk of money to raise in a short period of time.

The forest advocates should have begun their campaign months ago. One alternative would be to let the group see what it can do in the next six weeks to obtain pledges for the money, but with no promises that the deal could be struck with Forest Capital. That decision would be up to Forest Capital, the company that owns the trees and which originally tried to sell both the land and timber to the county as an alternative to its plan for logging. The county tried but was unable to come up with grant funding for the timber purchase.

Regardless of whether there’s a community forest or not, the county plans to manage MERA in a sustainable way. Selective cutting will occur, but forest health and reducing fire danger will be prime concerns. While that kind of forest management isn’t the same as preserving an old-growth forest like the community forest advocates want, it won’t result in clear-cutting and should make the MERA less prone to catastrophic fire. The recreation area is too near to town to run that risk, especially with access for virtually anyone who wants to visit MERA only a hop, skip and jump away from town.

The community forest advocates came up with a proactive response to the county’s inability to fund the entire purchase for land and timber. But without a lock on a half-million dollars, it’s likely come too late.
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
News
Local / Sports / Business / State / National / Obituaries / Public Notices
Opinion
Editorials / Letters / Guest Columns / Columnists
Features
Outdoors / Ag / Spiritual / Go Magazine / Portraits
Classifieds
View all classifieds / Jobs / Autos / Real Estate / Rentals / Place an Ad
The Observer
About / Contact / Commercial Printing / Subscriptions / Terms of Use / Site Map
Also Online
Photo Reprints / Slideshows / Weather and Valley Cam / /index.php?option=com_rss&feed=RSS2.0&no_html=1">RSS Feed ?> RSS Feed

Follow La Grande Observer headlines on Follow La Grande Observer headlines on Twitter

© Copyright 2001 - 2013 Western Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. By Using this site you agree to our Terms of Use

LaGrandeObserver.com works best with the latest versions of Mozilla Firefox, Microsoft Internet Explorer or Apple Safari