>La Grande Observer | Union and Wallowa Counties' News Leader

La Grande, OR forecast
& Eastern Oregon University Valley Cam

Observer news NE Oregon Classifieds Web
web powered by Web Search Powered by Google

Follow LaGrandeObserver.com

Today's front page

Image of The Observer's Front Page

Get Home Delivery of The Observer for only $8.50 per month, $9.50 for motor routes. Just click here and after filling out one simple and secure online form you could be on your way to learning more information about local, state and world news.

manage your account »

Recent article comments

Powered by Disqus

Home arrow Opinion arrow Letters arrow Letters and comments for December 5, 2011

Letters and comments for December 5, 2011

Letters and comments for December 5, 2011

Evolution and science

To the Editor:

The “Big Bang” requires pre-existing solid matter. Therefore, an evolutionist’s belief and faith has to be in eternal matter, and scientists have been unable to isolate and identify any solid inert matter at all.

If people evolved from scum, there is no moral system, and people have no value. What you have and what you are is all you get. Teaching evolution in our schools is resulting in a rapid loss in any moral values. Laws are written to regulate social behavior, but there must be some moral code for right and wrong as a basis. What is ours?

Some people reference a vague natural law. The ancient Romans may have been the first to use that term, and even they recognized that it must have some divine source.

In the Big Bang, all the energy in the universe, this one and any others, would have to have been present in one place. The Big Bang itself would have resulted in a tremendous release/loss of energy.

If there was such an explosion,

wouldn’t the presence of energy be less the farther out from the place where it happened? How does that explain the large stars in the distance?

The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that “the amount of unavailable energy” is increasing or, per Webster’s Dictionary, “Entropy” is “the degradation of the matter and energy in the universe to an ultimate state of inert uniformity.”

In other words, the earth and universe are wearing out, not improving, which means that evolution is not scientific.

When evolution is substituted for religion, it in itself becomes a religion. Why do we teach a substitute religion in our schools which has no basis in fact or science?

If there are any “hard” facts, please let me know.

Richard Beverly


blog comments powered by Disqus
Local / Sports / Business / State / National / Obituaries / Public Notices
Editorials / Letters / Guest Columns / Columnists
Outdoors / Ag / Spiritual / Go Magazine / Portraits
View all classifieds / Jobs / Autos / Real Estate / Rentals / Place an Ad
The Observer
About / Contact / Commercial Printing / Subscriptions / Terms of Use / Site Map
Also Online
Photo Reprints / Slideshows / Weather and Valley Cam / /index.php?option=com_rss&feed=RSS2.0&no_html=1">RSS Feed ?> RSS Feed

Follow La Grande Observer headlines on Follow La Grande Observer headlines on Twitter

© Copyright 2001 - 2014 Western Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. By Using this site you agree to our Terms of Use

LaGrandeObserver.com works best with the latest versions of Mozilla Firefox, Microsoft Internet Explorer or Apple Safari

cialis en ligne viagra proberen viagra alternatieven farmaco cialis 20 mg acheter cialis en belgique acheter viagra le moins cher costo viagra viagra sous ordonnance original viagra online bestellen k√ɬ∂p viagra i sverige comprar viagra precio viagra farmacia cialis ne marche pas prix viagra officiel france kamagra oral jelly acquisto viagra bald billiger cialis a vendre achat cialis en france prix viagra 2007 viagra g√ɬľnstiger