>La Grande Observer | Union and Wallowa Counties' News Leader

Observer news NE Oregon Classifieds Web
web powered by Web Search Powered by Google

Follow LaGrandeObserver.com

La Grande Observer print edition

view all La Grande Observer print publications »

La Grande Observer Daily Paper 07/28/14

The LaGrande Observer is now online in a Replica E-edition form and publishes Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. Current subscribers have full access to the E-edition.

View Paper

If you are not a current subscriber, subscribe today for immediate access.

Subscribe


Recent article comments

Powered by Disqus

Home arrow Opinion arrow Letters arrow Letters and comments for October 7, 2011

Letters and comments for October 7, 2011

Letters and comments for October 7, 2011

Enough roadless areas already


To the Editor:

In response to Mildrexler’s question “So what kind of Oregon do I want to leave future generations?” I would answer one that doesn’t have the roadless horse manure he is peddling.

Northeast Oregon already has more than its fair share of wilderness/roadless areas. I would submit that if Mr. Mildrexler can’t already find “solitude and adventure” within the existing boundary of the Eagle Caps, he is never going to find it. His viewpoint is very self-centered, because it totally leaves out the elderly/handicapped from being able to enjoy the views. There are no roads that go to the top of the mountain on the southern wilderness boundary line, and the only way that the elderly/handicapped can see the magnificent northward view, is accessing it by ATV.

If it wasn’t for jeepers, dirt bikers, miners, etc., who cut in all the motorized trails/roads during the ’50s, ’60s, ’70s, he wouldn’t be able to get to his Utopian destinations.

USFS logging survey crews used those trails and roads to access the backcountry when they were performing their job functions back then, and many logging roads were built right over the top of these “unregulated motorized use” trails/roads. That time period had substantially more Jeeps and motorcycles traversing the forest on any given day than the ATVs of today.

Some people seem to conveniently forget that, or have no clue because they are a Johnny-come-lately. The popularity of Jeeps died out in the ’80s because the purchase price became too high. Today, most people are unwilling to spend $30,000-plus on a new Jeep and then go bash it up while four-wheeling. Hence, the popularity of the ATVs, which are less expensive than a Jeep, and it has now become convenient to blame for a non-existent problem.

David Thiesfeld

La Grande

 
blog comments powered by Disqus
News
Local / Sports / Business / State / National / Obituaries / Public Notices
Opinion
Editorials / Letters / Guest Columns / Columnists
Features
Outdoors / Ag / Spiritual / Go Magazine / Portraits
Classifieds
View all classifieds / Jobs / Autos / Real Estate / Rentals / Place an Ad
The Observer
About / Contact / Commercial Printing / Subscriptions / Terms of Use / Site Map
Also Online
Photo Reprints / Slideshows / Weather and Valley Cam / /index.php?option=com_rss&feed=RSS2.0&no_html=1">RSS Feed ?> RSS Feed

Follow La Grande Observer headlines on Follow La Grande Observer headlines on Twitter

© Copyright 2001 - 2014 Western Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. By Using this site you agree to our Terms of Use