>La Grande Observer | Union and Wallowa Counties' News Leader

La Grande, OR forecast
& Eastern Oregon University Valley Cam

http://tinyurl.com/n2723qt
Observer news NE Oregon Classifieds Web
web powered by Web Search Powered by Google

Follow LaGrandeObserver.com

Today's front page

Image of The Observer's Front Page

Get Home Delivery of The Observer for only $8.50 per month, $9.50 for motor routes. Just click here and after filling out one simple and secure online form you could be on your way to learning more information about local, state and world news.

manage your account »

Recent article comments

Powered by Disqus

Home arrow Opinion arrow Letters arrow Letters and comments for September 22, 2011

Letters and comments for September 22, 2011

Letters and comments for September 22, 2011

Not ranchers’ interest


To the Editor:

Hey Suzanne Stone, Defenders of Wildlife, did you really say “ranchers helped to craft Oregon’s program and should be satisfied” and that no state has done more “to try to protect the interests of ranchers” (from “Ranchers uneasy living among wolves,” Sept 13)?

I know it’s been seven years but I’ll bet you haven’t forgotten that I, representing livestock producers on the wolf advisory committee, and the representative of Eastern Oregon county commissions, both wrote minority reports on that plan.

Remember, I wrote a page by page critique on the draft plan with reasonable changes that would make it simpler, less biased and more reasonable? I included a concept white paper on managing wolves by zones, places where they would be allowed to colonize and places where they would not. The report included a “full and fair” compensation model for livestock losses attributable to wolves. I also included in the report a minority opinion on legal status of the wolf in Oregon that concluded with a plea that the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission reject the draft plan and review the status of the wolf under Oregon law and remove it from our endangered species list.

I listed in the report other elements that the plan needed in order to be supported by the livestock industry including the tools and latitude to aggressively mitigate livestock-wolf conflict and swift removal of wolves that predate on livestock. Only one of our requirements was included in the adopted plan: That prevents the transplantation of wolves.

There must have been a misprint in your quote. It should more accurately read that “no state has done more to protect wolves” or “no state has done less to protect the interest of ranchers.’’ ODFW is doing more to further your agenda than they have ever done to protect the interests of ranchers.

Sharon Beck

Alicel

 
blog comments powered by Disqus
News
Local / Sports / Business / State / National / Obituaries / Public Notices
Opinion
Editorials / Letters / Guest Columns / Columnists
Features
Outdoors / Ag / Spiritual / Go Magazine / Portraits
Classifieds
View all classifieds / Jobs / Autos / Real Estate / Rentals / Place an Ad
The Observer
About / Contact / Commercial Printing / Subscriptions / Terms of Use / Site Map
Also Online
Photo Reprints / Slideshows / Weather and Valley Cam / /index.php?option=com_rss&feed=RSS2.0&no_html=1">RSS Feed ?> RSS Feed

Follow La Grande Observer headlines on Follow La Grande Observer headlines on Twitter

© Copyright 2001 - 2014 Western Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. By Using this site you agree to our Terms of Use

LaGrandeObserver.com works best with the latest versions of Mozilla Firefox, Microsoft Internet Explorer or Apple Safari