>La Grande Observer | Union and Wallowa Counties' News Leader

La Grande, OR forecast
& Eastern Oregon University Valley Cam

http://tinyurl.com/n2723qt
Observer news NE Oregon Classifieds Web
web powered by Web Search Powered by Google

Follow LaGrandeObserver.com

Today's front page

Image of The Observer's Front Page

Get Home Delivery of The Observer for only $8.50 per month, $9.50 for motor routes. Just click here and after filling out one simple and secure online form you could be on your way to learning more information about local, state and world news.

manage your account »

Recent article comments

Powered by Disqus

Home arrow Opinion arrow Letters arrow Letters to the editor for February 11, 2013

Letters to the editor for February 11, 2013

Solution in the gun debate may benefit both sides

To the Editor:

I have listened to all the talk about guns and their misuse. I think I have come up with a solution that would give something for both sides to think about (although I’m not sure either side ever thinks).

Suggestion 1. The convicted perpetrator of any crime using a weapon should be neutered.

Suggestion 2. Any person who shoots another person in the back should be neutered.

Suggestion 3. Any person who shoots an unarmed person should be neutered.

Suggestion 4. The owner of a weapon who looses or has one stolen and it is used in a crime should be held accountable since they failed to properly secure their weapons.

There is no way to prevent an insane person from perpetrating an insane act or to prevent any person who believes their God is so weak that it cannot solve its own worship problems, but if the names of the perpetrators or their organizations were never published, at least we could as a nation that they are not worthy of our consideration.

I know that sounds harsh, and it is. However, it is a sure deterrent to gun violence, and those people who choose to use guns irresponsibly would not produce and train children who believe that irresponsible behavior is acceptable.

This suggestion would not in any way limit people from having a gun, so the NRA should find this an acceptable solution and certainly those who wish stronger gun control would accept that this is certainly much stronger than any law restricting gun ownership.

Ernest I. Smith

Union

 
blog comments powered by Disqus
News
Local / Sports / Business / State / National / Obituaries / Public Notices
Opinion
Editorials / Letters / Guest Columns / Columnists
Features
Outdoors / Ag / Spiritual / Go Magazine / Portraits
Classifieds
View all classifieds / Jobs / Autos / Real Estate / Rentals / Place an Ad
The Observer
About / Contact / Commercial Printing / Subscriptions / Terms of Use / Site Map
Also Online
Photo Reprints / Slideshows / Weather and Valley Cam / /index.php?option=com_rss&feed=RSS2.0&no_html=1">RSS Feed ?> RSS Feed

Follow La Grande Observer headlines on Follow La Grande Observer headlines on Twitter

© Copyright 2001 - 2014 Western Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. By Using this site you agree to our Terms of Use

LaGrandeObserver.com works best with the latest versions of Mozilla Firefox, Microsoft Internet Explorer or Apple Safari

cialis en ligne viagra proberen viagra alternatieven generique sildenafil citrate acheter cialis en belgique acheter viagra le moins cher costo viagra viagra sous ordonnance original viagra online bestellen k√ɬ∂p viagra i sverige comprar viagra precio viagra farmacia cialis ne marche pas kamagra g√ɬľnstig bestellen kamagra oral jelly acquisto viagra bald billiger cialis a vendre achat cialis en france prix viagra 2007 viagra g√ɬľnstiger