>La Grande Observer | Union and Wallowa Counties' News Leader

Observer news NE Oregon Classifieds Web
web powered by Web Search Powered by Google

Follow LaGrandeObserver.com

La Grande Observer print edition

view all La Grande Observer print publications »

La Grande Observer Daily Paper 08/01/14

The LaGrande Observer is now online in a Replica E-edition form and publishes Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. Current subscribers have full access to the E-edition.

View Paper

If you are not a current subscriber, subscribe today for immediate access.

Subscribe


Recent article comments

Powered by Disqus

Home arrow Opinion arrow Our View arrow OUR VIEW: I-5 bridge a risky proposition

OUR VIEW: I-5 bridge a risky proposition

The ongoing debate — some could argue dispute — regarding the proposal to build a new Interstate 5/light rail bridge over the Columbia River continues to linger in the Oregon Legislature.

The issue appears at first glance to be simply a “their side of the state” problem, but the fact is the entire state pays taxes and it is those dollars that will fuel a project like the new bridge.

The idea of a new span across the Columbia carries a great deal of merit — it could greatly enhance commerce between Oregon and Washington state — but there is a rather large problem with the concept. Washington State lawmakers don’t want to pay a share of construction of a new span.

Last year, Oregon lawmakers appeared more than willing to embrace the concept, but legislators in Washington state balked in the end at the venture.

Last week, the Oregon House Transportation and Economic Development Committee OK’d a proposal to push the Legislature budget committee.

That means the nearly $3 billion dollar project is alive and well and it may also mean that if construction goes forward Oregon — and the federal government — would pay for it.

The subject is a complicated one — as are most issues that end up in the Legislature — but the commonsense solution to the problem isn’t convoluted.

Put simply, unless Washington state can step forward and help pay for the bridge, Oregon lawmakers should abandon the concept.

Without Washington state’s help, Oregon taxpayers will be pushed out on a shaky limb of 
overextension.

Until lawmakers in Washington state feel they can lend a hand in terms of funds, this is one of those ideas that the Oregon Legislature needs to shelve.

 
blog comments powered by Disqus
News
Local / Sports / Business / State / National / Obituaries / Public Notices
Opinion
Editorials / Letters / Guest Columns / Columnists
Features
Outdoors / Ag / Spiritual / Go Magazine / Portraits
Classifieds
View all classifieds / Jobs / Autos / Real Estate / Rentals / Place an Ad
The Observer
About / Contact / Commercial Printing / Subscriptions / Terms of Use / Site Map
Also Online
Photo Reprints / Slideshows / Weather and Valley Cam / /index.php?option=com_rss&feed=RSS2.0&no_html=1">RSS Feed ?> RSS Feed

Follow La Grande Observer headlines on Follow La Grande Observer headlines on Twitter

© Copyright 2001 - 2014 Western Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. By Using this site you agree to our Terms of Use