>La Grande Observer | Union and Wallowa Counties' News Leader

Observer news NE Oregon Classifieds Web
web powered by Web Search Powered by Google

Follow LaGrandeObserver.com

La Grande Observer print edition

view all La Grande Observer print publications »

La Grande Observer Paper 08/20/14

The LaGrande Observer is now online in a Replica E-edition form and publishes Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. Current subscribers have full access to the E-edition.

View Paper

If you are not a current subscriber, subscribe today for immediate access.


Recent article comments

Powered by Disqus

Home arrow Opinion arrow Our View arrow VOTE FOR MEASURE 28 TO PROTECT ECONOMY


Citizens have various reasons for supporting Measure 28, Oregon's temporary income tax increase proposal. They don't want to see their public schools short-changed to such a point that more teachers are laid off or programs are eliminated.

THEY STRUGGLE with Eastern Oregon University students having to pay a significant tuition increase. They don't want to see Oregon State Police trooper positions cut or have senior citizens' long-term care dramatically altered.

Beyond the social consequences that would occur if voters reject the measure on Jan. 28 is the devastating consequences to Northeast Oregon's economy.

Bob Nelson, manager of the area office of the Oregon Employment Department, looked at the local government programs and agencies that receive state and federal dollars, and did some number-crunching. Nelson estimates there will be an economic loss of $5.7 million to Union County if Measure 28 fails.

HUGE HITS would occur within the Seniors and Persons with Disabilities program of the Department of Human Resources, which provides assistance for people in nursing homes and assisted living facilities and other services for senior citizens. The losses in the Department of Human Services locally is expected to run $4.2 million. Public schools throughout the county and EOU also would be hit hard if Measure 48 is rejected — to the tune of more than $800,000.

The loss of $5.7 million translates into more than 100 full- and part-time jobs that would go by the wayside. The loss of more than $400,000 a month in the economy likely would be felt by every business in Union County.

But what of the cost of Measure 28 to the taxpayer? State officials estimate the additional taxes paid will range between $17 and $107 a year for families with adjusted gross annual incomes ranging from $10,000 to $50,000. Nelson estimates that Union County will see an overall tax increase of $632,000.

That figure represents a relatively small amount when compared to the state and federal dollars that would be lost to the local economy if state programs are cut. For every dollar a rural county might send to Salem, much more returns to meet residents' needs.

Passage of Measure 28 will not only keep important services in place, it makes good economic sense for all of Northeast Oregon. The Observer recommends a yes vote on 28.


Have an opinion that's different from ours, our columnists or our letter writers? Write it down and send it in. The Observer encourages reader input through letters and guest columns.

Almost everything is fair game for a comment — The Observer, local issues, state issues, national or international. Please write!

blog comments powered by Disqus
Local / Sports / Business / State / National / Obituaries / Public Notices
Editorials / Letters / Guest Columns / Columnists
Outdoors / Ag / Spiritual / Go Magazine / Portraits
View all classifieds / Jobs / Autos / Real Estate / Rentals / Place an Ad
The Observer
About / Contact / Commercial Printing / Subscriptions / Terms of Use / Site Map
Also Online
Photo Reprints / Slideshows / Weather and Valley Cam / /index.php?option=com_rss&feed=RSS2.0&no_html=1">RSS Feed ?> RSS Feed

Follow La Grande Observer headlines on Follow La Grande Observer headlines on Twitter

© Copyright 2001 - 2014 Western Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. By Using this site you agree to our Terms of Use