This is the second of a two-part series on voting. The first part, which looked at the Union County’s sheriff race in May and explained a challenged ballot, an over-vote and an under-vote, ran Thursday, Oct. 8.

LA GRANDE — Robin Church said she often hears about how the vote of eastside or rural Oregonians doesn’t matter because the west determines how elections go.

But with next month’s general election 21 days away, the longtime Union County clerk contends that is only the case if people indeed don’t vote, and pointed to a recent state election as evidence — the Knute Buehler vs. Kate Brown governor race in 2018.

“That race was decided by (nearly) 120,000 votes. I know people on this side of the state complain all the time that their vote doesn’t count. Their vote doesn’t count because they don’t cast it. Their vote counts if they cast their ballot,” she said. “It’s gotten so ingrained into people that this side of the state doesn’t matter. The other side runs everything. That’s not necessarily true.”

In the 2018 election, 119,710 votes separated Brown from Buehler out of more than 1.86 million ballots cast, and the state had a voter turnout of almost 68%.

But there were close to 885,000 voters in the state who did not mark a ballot in the governor’s race, and the majority of those who decided not to vote — by a 51-49% margin — came from the 32 counties in the state with 250,000 or fewer voters, according to data Church shared with The Observer. That’s despite them making up a smaller portion of the state’s voters — the four largest counties carry a 52-48% edge in registered voters. More than 433,000 in those four did not vote, but more than 450,000 didn’t vote in the smaller counties.

True, Brown did win Multnomah County, the state’s largest, by almost 200,000 votes. Multnomah, though, voted above the state percentage at nearly 71%, with more than 378,000 ballots cast. The three counties that gave Brown the most votes all performed higher than the statewide mark.

Conversely, in the five counties Buehler won, just two — Deschutes and Clackamas — were above the state average, and both Linn and Marion were under 63%.

Locally, Union County also underperformed, voting at a 65.5% clip in 2018, with 6,190 voters out of 17,946 not casting a ballot in that election. Wallowa County was at 72%.

“Everyone talks about this race as the race that discourages them from ever voting again,” Church said, adding she personally knows 10 people who didn’t take part in the midterm.

Are there enough voters in the smaller areas of the state to make a serious impact? Here’s a look at that 2018 election as an example: What would it have taken to swing that election? If more ballots were cast in smaller counties, and everything else remained the same, could it have flipped? And could that matter in elections next month?

The largest counties had a higher turnout in 2018, at 69.8% to 65.7%. By the 32 smaller counties — everyone except Multnomah, Washington, Clackamas and Lane — simply turning out at the same rate as the biggest four, about 54,000 more people would have voted. Had the margin of Buehler’s lead in those counties held the same (he pulled in 54.21% compared to Brown’s 37.96%), Brown’s overall win would still be well intact but would have been trimmed by about 9,000 votes.

The gap narrows the higher the voter turnout is. While it’s a percentage typically unseen in elections today, if the smaller counties turned out at 85%, and the voting margins were the exact same, that would bring out more than 1.1 million voters from those counties — or 100,000 more than the big counties. Brown still would win, but rather than a win of nearly 120,000 votes, the difference would be less than 79,000 votes.

What numbers would, in theory, have pushed Buehler over the top? Claiming more of the voters in areas he won.

Though he ran as a Republican, Buehler’s pro-choice stance hurt his chances within his own party. Brown’s margin in the key large counties was nearly 26 percentage points — 60.46% to 34.56%. What if Buehler did close to that in his stronger areas of the state? Continuing the look at the smaller counties, an 85% turnout with him receiving 60% of the vote (and Brown the same 37.96%) clips the margin to less than 14,000.

And an increase of his vote reception to 61.3% would give him a margin in those counties of 260,625 — enough to edge Brown by 624 votes.

“They just can’t tell me that that 100,000 voters makes that much difference,” Church said of the rural-vs-urban split.

Recommended for you

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.